<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use GMail Plus-Addressing to Generate Throw-Away E-Mail Addresses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/comment-page-1/#comment-37713</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-37713</guid>
		<description>More detailed information on this phenomenon:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/addressing/
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Sub-addressing
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More detailed information on this phenomenon:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/addressing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/addressing/</a><br />
<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233" rel="nofollow">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Sub-addressing" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#Sub-addressing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/comment-page-1/#comment-37076</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-37076</guid>
		<description>He means create for example, account@gmail.com, then give all of your contacts an address like account+myname@gmail.com.  Then if you give websites an address like account+spam@gmail.com, even if they delete the +spam part, account@gmail.com will still be filtered out from his regular mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He means create for example, <a href="mailto:account@gmail.com">account@gmail.com</a>, then give all of your contacts an address like <a href="mailto:account+myname@gmail.com">account+myname@gmail.com</a>.  Then if you give websites an address like <a href="mailto:account+spam@gmail.com">account+spam@gmail.com</a>, even if they delete the +spam part, <a href="mailto:account@gmail.com">account@gmail.com</a> will still be filtered out from his regular mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/comment-page-1/#comment-37058</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-37058</guid>
		<description>GMail will not let you create an account with and address with &quot;+&quot; in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMail will not let you create an account with and address with &#8220;+&#8221; in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.B. Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/980/use-gmail-plus-addressing-to-generate-throw-away-e-mail-addresses/comment-page-1/#comment-34518</link>
		<dc:creator>D.B. Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-34518</guid>
		<description>Would this work?
When you first start using gmail, give everyone you like your new address as:
myaddress+6342@gmail.com
Then filter out  mail addressed to myaddress@gmail.com to be labeled spam.
Use myaddress@gmail.com when you register at sites that you don&#039;t want to give your real address to.
You would still have the option to give other alias plus addresses if for some reason you wanted to track spread of a particular address to spam lists.
The spammers who eventually catch on to stripping off the plus part of gmail addresses would be stymied.  
If your +6342 address started getting spam, you would have to change to a new plus suffix and let everyone know, but I guess you would have to do that with any address. 
Do you think using myaddress+____ would have more of a tendency to stay spam free even after the spamlist starts stripping off the plus suffixes?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this work?<br />
When you first start using gmail, give everyone you like your new address as:<br />
<a href="mailto:myaddress+6342@gmail.com">myaddress+6342@gmail.com</a><br />
Then filter out  mail addressed to <a href="mailto:myaddress@gmail.com">myaddress@gmail.com</a> to be labeled spam.<br />
Use <a href="mailto:myaddress@gmail.com">myaddress@gmail.com</a> when you register at sites that you don&#8217;t want to give your real address to.<br />
You would still have the option to give other alias plus addresses if for some reason you wanted to track spread of a particular address to spam lists.<br />
The spammers who eventually catch on to stripping off the plus part of gmail addresses would be stymied.<br />
If your +6342 address started getting spam, you would have to change to a new plus suffix and let everyone know, but I guess you would have to do that with any address.<br />
Do you think using myaddress+____ would have more of a tendency to stay spam free even after the spamlist starts stripping off the plus suffixes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/11 queries in 0.487 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 308/311 objects using memcached

Served from: www.tech-recipes.com @ 2012-02-10 12:08:05 -->
