Comments on: Outlook: Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message

By: Chetan

Chetan — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:11:44 +0000

Thanks a lot for suggesting.

By: Cheap Bastard

Cheap Bastard — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:07:38 +0000

This is not a reliable work around. It only works in *some* situations, and actually makes the problem uglier because it then becomes difficult to see why rules are not being executed as expected.

I have a suspicion that some rules are process on the exchange server, and some rules are processed locally. Somewhere along the line, a hand-off is made, and I don't believe the message is ever handed back to the server to process server based rules. It's a real mess regardless of what's happening. "Stop processing more rules" worsens things, because sometimes messages take the wrong path, and other times they are duplicated anyway because of parallel server/local processing.

Outlook users only have an illusion that they have control over the processing of their mail. Advanced users should switch to linux, and use *procmail*, the holy grail of mail processing.

By: eryador

eryador — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:01:31 +0000

You probably have to re-order your rules.
Most probably you have got some rules “relocating” some types of messages into specific directories. these “belong to” rules must be “seated” at the end of the list!

By: eryador

eryador — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:55:11 +0000

thanks a million. eyes opening.

By: StarSphere

StarSphere — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:37:19 +0000

This tip worked for a while, at first. But now, I am getting duplicate and triplicate messages again, and all my rules already have the “stop processing more rules” clause. Any ideas?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:32:46 +0000

Like I say – works like a charm – exactly what I was googling for and the first/top hit too :) I’ve had experience with rules like that before (Eudora, among others) but it just wasn’t so obvious with outlook.. kind of hidden among many other options, when it’s so important – it should really be a checkbox by itself at the end or something.

Thanks!

Cheers

Andrew Derry

By: Trem01

Trem01 — Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:42:46 +0000

I found that this helped my duplicates hugely. To get around the issues listed in prior posts, I put my rules in order of importance, so that I would catch most of my duplicates. Prioritizing definitely seems to have helped. JM2cents

By: Guest

Guest — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:31:45 +0000

Thanks a lot, I have been searching the Web for several hours to find this perfect solution!

Good job!

By: JAKendall

JAKendall — Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:07:59 +0000

Thanks! that was just what I was looking for! A+!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 09 Sep 2004 06:34:03 +0000

netringer wrote:

My experience is that “stop processing more rules” doesn’t work as you would think. It looks to me like “stop processing more rules” is followed even when the test condition doesn’t match.

I’ve had the exact same problems you’ve described; I believe that “stop processing more rules” is always executed despite what the rules wizard may tell you.

Is there another solution to the initial problem?