<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-52012</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-52012</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-46641</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-46641</guid>
		<description>I got the same problem and it was due to overlapping rules. The best solution is to go over your rules and delete duplicates or near duplicates. It took me 2 good hours to do it, but now the dupes are gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same problem and it was due to overlapping rules. The best solution is to go over your rules and delete duplicates or near duplicates. It took me 2 good hours to do it, but now the dupes are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-44831</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-44831</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. I was clueless on what is going on. I think this should be default on any rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. I was clueless on what is going on. I think this should be default on any rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-44734</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-44734</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m now trying the &quot;stop processing more rules&quot; trick on sorting rules and also putting them at the end of the list. Will see whether that fixes my problem. Anyway, thanks everyone for the tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now trying the &#8220;stop processing more rules&#8221; trick on sorting rules and also putting them at the end of the list. Will see whether that fixes my problem. Anyway, thanks everyone for the tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-44733</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-44733</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a mess, an ugly TRILLION-$$$$ mess. At my main work machine I use Thunderbird, rules work mostly fine. At our main client I&#039;ve also got an e-mail account with ton of incoming technical spam (such-or-such operation succeeded - 1 to 24 times a day for many operations) and they use GRMBL Outlook which isn&#039;t able to provide a sensible, reliable interface to sort them out ! (Got the same duplicates problem.) With all the $$$$$ bucks M$ likely put into the program, you wonder why they can&#039;t make things work ? And this even at the simplest level: resizable dialogs, anyone ? Not Micro$$$$oft !!! Maybe in their recommendation guidelines, but not in the Rule system of $$$$$$ Outlook !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a mess, an ugly TRILLION-$$$$ mess. At my main work machine I use Thunderbird, rules work mostly fine. At our main client I&#8217;ve also got an e-mail account with ton of incoming technical spam (such-or-such operation succeeded &#8211; 1 to 24 times a day for many operations) and they use GRMBL Outlook which isn&#8217;t able to provide a sensible, reliable interface to sort them out ! (Got the same duplicates problem.) With all the $$$$$ bucks M$ likely put into the program, you wonder why they can&#8217;t make things work ? And this even at the simplest level: resizable dialogs, anyone ? Not Micro$$$$oft !!! Maybe in their recommendation guidelines, but not in the Rule system of $$$$$$ Outlook !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek_p_kapa</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-42462</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek_p_kapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-42462</guid>
		<description>Thank you soo muchhhhhh......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you soo muchhhhhh&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek_p_kapadia</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-42461</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek_p_kapadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-42461</guid>
		<description>thn you soo much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thn you soo much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-41352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-41352</guid>
		<description>When I click Apply in the Rules and Alerts dialog box, I get a message saying that there&#039;s the Stop Processing More Rules will stop other rules from running and asking if I&#039;m sure I want to do this. I want all the rules to run, so I don&#039;t understand why you would want this setting. Also, Outlook 2010 is adding it in by itself when I click Apply; it&#039;s not in the rule itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I click Apply in the Rules and Alerts dialog box, I get a message saying that there&#8217;s the Stop Processing More Rules will stop other rules from running and asking if I&#8217;m sure I want to do this. I want all the rules to run, so I don&#8217;t understand why you would want this setting. Also, Outlook 2010 is adding it in by itself when I click Apply; it&#8217;s not in the rule itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-29374</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-29374</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for suggesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for suggesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/comment-page-1/#comment-27407</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-27407</guid>
		<description>This is not a reliable work around.  It only works in *some* situations, and actually makes the problem uglier because it then becomes difficult to see why rules are not being executed as expected.

I have a suspicion that some rules are process on the exchange server, and some rules are processed locally.  Somewhere along the line, a hand-off is made, and I don&#039;t believe the message is ever handed back to the server to process server based rules.  It&#039;s a real mess regardless of what&#039;s happening.  &quot;Stop processing more rules&quot; worsens things, because sometimes messages take the wrong path, and other times they are duplicated anyway because of parallel server/local processing.

Outlook users only have an illusion that they have control over the processing of their mail.  Advanced users should switch to linux, and use *procmail*, the holy grail of mail processing.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a reliable work around.  It only works in *some* situations, and actually makes the problem uglier because it then becomes difficult to see why rules are not being executed as expected.</p>
<p>I have a suspicion that some rules are process on the exchange server, and some rules are processed locally.  Somewhere along the line, a hand-off is made, and I don&#8217;t believe the message is ever handed back to the server to process server based rules.  It&#8217;s a real mess regardless of what&#8217;s happening.  &#8220;Stop processing more rules&#8221; worsens things, because sometimes messages take the wrong path, and other times they are duplicated anyway because of parallel server/local processing.</p>
<p>Outlook users only have an illusion that they have control over the processing of their mail.  Advanced users should switch to linux, and use *procmail*, the holy grail of mail processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 1.107 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 420/424 objects using memcached

Served from: www.tech-recipes.com @ 2012-02-10 05:54:25 -->
