<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail: Create a Distribution (Group) List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2744/gmail_create_distribution_group_list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2744/gmail_create_distribution_group_list/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2744/gmail_create_distribution_group_list/comment-page-1/#comment-11684</link>
		<dc:creator>David Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11684</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that there may very well be fine reasons why these questions aren&#039;t solved by a recipe --whether it be because something&#039;s  insoluble or perhaps if its very notion presents a transgression of the mail RFCs.  Still I think that there are very good reasons for addressing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that there may very well be fine reasons why these questions aren&#39;t solved by a recipe &#8211;whether it be because something&#39;s  insoluble or perhaps if its very notion presents a transgression of the mail RFCs.  Still I think that there are very good reasons for addressing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2744/gmail_create_distribution_group_list/comment-page-1/#comment-11680</link>
		<dc:creator>David Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11680</guid>
		<description>I do appreciate this posting&#039;s intent, and would like to say &quot;Thank you&quot; for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must offer a critical set of remarks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This recipe does little good for those seeking to utilize the notion of a distribution group as they&#039;ve come to know it from the context of other e-mail clients.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The pared-down approach of only having a single recipient as comprised by a *group* does nothing to answer the inevitable and relevant questions about how to reproduce familiar functionality in the field of the GMail client.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I found this posting while looking for a recipe for using the GUI to name a single recipient and have each and every member of a user-defined group receive a message that appears to be addressed to a single group name with no explicated CC or TO field constituents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps you can add this, or revise the post with an appeal to the reading community to make it less self-evident than the GMail interface itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for the starting point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do appreciate this posting&#39;s intent, and would like to say &#8220;Thank you&#8221; for it.</p>
<p>I must offer a critical set of remarks.</p>
<p>This recipe does little good for those seeking to utilize the notion of a distribution group as they&#39;ve come to know it from the context of other e-mail clients.</p>
<p>The pared-down approach of only having a single recipient as comprised by a *group* does nothing to answer the inevitable and relevant questions about how to reproduce familiar functionality in the field of the GMail client.</p>
<p>I found this posting while looking for a recipe for using the GUI to name a single recipient and have each and every member of a user-defined group receive a message that appears to be addressed to a single group name with no explicated CC or TO field constituents.</p>
<p>Perhaps you can add this, or revise the post with an appeal to the reading community to make it less self-evident than the GMail interface itself.</p>
<p>Thank you for the starting point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
