<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Media Encoder 9 : Batch file encoding videos from mpg, avi, asf to wmv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:14:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Visitor</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-16367</link>
		<dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-16367</guid>
		<description>Excellent script thanks for sharing!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one thing, is it possible for the script to process videos in subfolders of Raw?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If i could do that it would be perfect for me! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent script thanks for sharing!</p>
<p>Just one thing, is it possible for the script to process videos in subfolders of Raw?</p>
<p>If i could do that it would be perfect for me! </p>
<p>Many Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almny</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-12884</link>
		<dc:creator>almny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-12884</guid>
		<description>i want to ask also about &lt;br&gt;Is there away to use xvid codecs for the encdoing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to ask also about <br />Is there away to use xvid codecs for the encdoing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-11874</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11874</guid>
		<description>Ah, ha.  Editing the prx is no good for a lay person.  I found if I double clicked the prx, I could change the settings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The settings there are plainer, more straight forward than the confusing wizzard.  Plus, no unresponsiveness.  And video quality beats divx and xvid for size.  By a long shot.    THis is the perfect solution for me.   For others, I think they need a more unified one step application for wm9 encoding.  I think especially easy batch vbr encoding built in to  the OS could make this the divx killer.  And deservedly so, since the quality is so good.  I think the next advance will be when the codec does facial recognition to encode faces at high quality.  Then we will see bit rates half again.  Imagine a watchable stream at 151 kps video which would rival ntsc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ha.  Editing the prx is no good for a lay person.  I found if I double clicked the prx, I could change the settings.</p>
<p>The settings there are plainer, more straight forward than the confusing wizzard.  Plus, no unresponsiveness.  And video quality beats divx and xvid for size.  By a long shot.    THis is the perfect solution for me.   For others, I think they need a more unified one step application for wm9 encoding.  I think especially easy batch vbr encoding built in to  the OS could make this the divx killer.  And deservedly so, since the quality is so good.  I think the next advance will be when the codec does facial recognition to encode faces at high quality.  Then we will see bit rates half again.  Imagine a watchable stream at 151 kps video which would rival ntsc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-11869</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11869</guid>
		<description>I saved the 1 mb 640x480 session, then edited to the prx format, then made a corresponding bat file.   But when I clicked it, I created a huge file with only %50 compression from raw video - not the expected 15 x compression.   Need help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saved the 1 mb 640&#215;480 session, then edited to the prx format, then made a corresponding bat file.   But when I clicked it, I created a huge file with only %50 compression from raw video &#8211; not the expected 15 x compression.   Need help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-11827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11827</guid>
		<description>At first I noticed wm9 stream superior to every other stream.  Especially vbr.   I tested the vbr against divx 7, and there is no comparison.  The wmv vbr files are far superior.  At least in my interest of 600 by 480&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However I hate the wm9 encoder gui. Few things I ever touched are less responsive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am wondering if your script will do the wm9 vbr?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ps. I did try xvid but no luck yet getting anything small and of good quality.   Maybe the divx pro can compete with wmv vbr, but not the free. Except MS must make the interface work, while it barely does now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I noticed wm9 stream superior to every other stream.  Especially vbr.   I tested the vbr against divx 7, and there is no comparison.  The wmv vbr files are far superior.  At least in my interest of 600 by 480</p>
<p>However I hate the wm9 encoder gui. Few things I ever touched are less responsive.</p>
<p>I am wondering if your script will do the wm9 vbr?</p>
<p>Ps. I did try xvid but no luck yet getting anything small and of good quality.   Maybe the divx pro can compete with wmv vbr, but not the free. Except MS must make the interface work, while it barely does now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-11643</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-11643</guid>
		<description>Is there away to use xvid codecs for the encdoing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there away to use xvid codecs for the encdoing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2699/windows_media_encoder_9_batch_file_encoding_videos_from_mpg_avi_asf_to_wmv/comment-page-1/#comment-3694</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-3694</guid>
		<description>Works pretty darned good for batch encoding!
To get it to work in Windows Vista, you need to disable DEP completely... But that&#039;s a Windows thing ;)

The only thing is, it is NOT converting the frame rate of my 23FPS video files to the required 29.97FPS for Zune compatibility, and I&#039;m not sure why...

Otherwise, a great little thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works pretty darned good for batch encoding!<br />
To get it to work in Windows Vista, you need to disable DEP completely&#8230; But that&#8217;s a Windows thing ;)</p>
<p>The only thing is, it is NOT converting the frame rate of my 23FPS video files to the required 29.97FPS for Zune compatibility, and I&#8217;m not sure why&#8230;</p>
<p>Otherwise, a great little thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
