<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kwiecien-Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-44254</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kwiecien-Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-44254</guid>
		<description>FYI: as of Solaris Express 11, disk usage is reported correctly:
&quot;zfs list&quot; will show the size of the volume (minus parity)
&quot;zpool list&quot; will show the size of the volume (including parity)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: as of Solaris Express 11, disk usage is reported correctly:<br />
&#8220;zfs list&#8221; will show the size of the volume (minus parity)<br />
&#8220;zpool list&#8221; will show the size of the volume (including parity)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Miklas</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-29787</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Miklas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-29787</guid>
		<description>In fact 30% is almost like having 2 disks space available in 3 disk RAID-5 array, right?
I would consider them the same in general - done in hardware or software, still requires a drive for parity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact 30% is almost like having 2 disks space available in 3 disk RAID-5 array, right?<br />
I would consider them the same in general &#8211; done in hardware or software, still requires a drive for parity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-26196</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-26196</guid>
		<description>Would it be correct to assume that utilizing raidz would make data about 30% bigger in size but with the advantage of having an ever-expanding RAID-5? As to say that instead of having the typical trade-off of a RAID-5 with the array minus one HDD... and in this case roughly 30% file size increase? Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be correct to assume that utilizing raidz would make data about 30% bigger in size but with the advantage of having an ever-expanding RAID-5? As to say that instead of having the typical trade-off of a RAID-5 with the array minus one HDD&#8230; and in this case roughly 30% file size increase? Just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.696 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 290/293 objects using memcached

Served from: www.tech-recipes.com @ 2012-02-09 16:28:28 -->
