<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/</link>
	<description>Computer and technology tutorials and guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:38:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Miklas</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-10847</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Miklas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-10847</guid>
		<description>In fact 30% is almost like having 2 disks space available in 3 disk RAID-5 array, right?&lt;br&gt;I would consider them the same in general - done in hardware or software, still requires a drive for parity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact 30% is almost like having 2 disks space available in 3 disk RAID-5 array, right?<br />I would consider them the same in general &#8211; done in hardware or software, still requires a drive for parity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monologue</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-6407</link>
		<dc:creator>monologue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-6407</guid>
		<description>Would it be correct to assume that utilizing raidz would make data about 30% bigger in size but with the advantage of having an ever-expanding RAID-5? As to say that instead of having the typical trade-off of a RAID-5 with the array minus one HDD... and in this case roughly 30% file size increase? Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be correct to assume that utilizing raidz would make data about 30% bigger in size but with the advantage of having an ever-expanding RAID-5? As to say that instead of having the typical trade-off of a RAID-5 with the array minus one HDD&#8230; and in this case roughly 30% file size increase? Just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urgethepresident</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/comment-page-1/#comment-5161</link>
		<dc:creator>urgethepresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">guid-fix-me!#comment-5161</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raidz.net&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://raidz.net&quot;&gt;raidz.net&lt;/a&gt; - a perspective&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.raidz.net"><br /></a><a href="http://raidz.net">raidz.net</a> &#8211; a perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
