Comments on: C++: Destructor http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1231/c-destructor/ Computer and technology tutorials and guides Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:01:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Reeeee http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1231/c-destructor/comment-page-1/#comment-42931 Reeeee Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:05:00 +0000 guid-fix-me!#comment-42931 "this" is already being destroyed, so you can move on to the next one. Actually, you could probably only call the destructor on the next element, without actually iterating over the entire list (you'll call the destructor increasingly more times for the latter elements in the linked list, as each element will iterate through all its successors). “this” is already being destroyed, so you can move on to the next one. Actually, you could probably only call the destructor on the next element, without actually iterating over the entire list (you’ll call the destructor increasingly more times for the latter elements in the linked list, as each element will iterate through all its successors).

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1231/c-destructor/comment-page-1/#comment-38180 Anonymous Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:56:00 +0000 guid-fix-me!#comment-38180 GOOD CONSTRUCTOR & DESTRUCTOR GOOD CONSTRUCTOR & DESTRUCTOR

]]> By: techdude http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1231/c-destructor/comment-page-1/#comment-36105 techdude Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:09:00 +0000 guid-fix-me!#comment-36105 I belive that to remove all of the objects, instead of "Next* n = this->next;", you should put "Next* n = this;" Great example! I belive that to remove all of the objects, instead of “Next* n = this->next;”, you should put “Next* n = this;”

Great example!

]]>